Re: Gulls, gulls and more gulls

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Phil Davis: "Gyrfalcon Status (was Re: Cape Henlopen & Records Committee)"
• Previous message: Eugene J. Scarpulla: "Conowingo Dam: 02/13/98"
• Maybe in reply to: Fran Saunders: "Gulls, gulls and more gulls"
• Next in thread: Kathy Klimkiewicz: "Re: Gulls, gulls and more gulls"

Makes sense to me.  Suspect that is not uncommon in closely related
species.

Tom Loomis



----------
> From: Fran Saunders <saunderf@ARI.Net>
> To: mdosprey@ARI.Net
> Subject: Gulls, gulls and more gulls
> Date: Friday, February 13, 1998 2:49 PM
> 
> 
> Rick Blom wrote:
> 
> >         In a year or two, when the committee has voted on this
> >         record, and  published the results, there will be another
opinion to add to
> > 	the debate. It may even be a better opinion, although that it
> > 	not always the case.
> > 
> All right then, after some thought I have another 
> opinion....Since some of us were so certain of some of the 
> field marks and since there seems to be a confusion of field
> marks, could the bird be a hybrid?
> 
> Fran
> 
> --------------------------------
> Fran Saunders
> Maryland Ornithological Society
> State Web Site Director
> saunderf@ari.net
> http://www2.ari.net/saunderf/mos/mos.html
> 
> 

• Next message: Phil Davis: "Gyrfalcon Status (was Re: Cape Henlopen & Records Committee)"
• Previous message: Eugene J. Scarpulla: "Conowingo Dam: 02/13/98"
• Maybe in reply to: Fran Saunders: "Gulls, gulls and more gulls"
• Next in thread: Kathy Klimkiewicz: "Re: Gulls, gulls and more gulls"